Discussion of Answers to Quiz 3

 

Questions 1-3

More than 90% of the class got question 1 right.  You can do this one if you can draw a supply and demand curve. 

About 80% of the class got question 2 right.  You can do this if you know what a sales tax paid by buyers does to the demand and/or supply curves.  This was discussed in great detail in the text and in class.

Only about half of the class got question 3 right.  Excess burden is defined and the way to calculate excess burden is demonstrated on pages 113-114 of your text.
 

Questions 4-6.

About 95% of the class got question 4 right.  75% got question 5 right and 60% got question 6 right.  To answer these questions properly, you need to understand how a profit-maximizing firm decides how many laborers to hire.  This was discussed in lecture.  It is also explained on pages 147-48 of your text and you also are guided on how to do this in the lab report for Experiment 5, pp 159-62.
 

Questions 7-11.

About 70% of the class got questions 7  and 8 right.  This is another simple application of the theory of derived demand for labor. See the remarks regarding questions 4-6.  Slightly less than half of the class got question 9 right.  This one should be easy if you know how to draw the demand curve for labor (see question 8) and if you realize that the supply curve will be  vertical  at 11 workers.  (Because there are only 11 workers and each of them has a reservation wage of just about zero.)  About 40% of the class got question 10 right.  To answer this, you had to be able to draw the demand curve for labor, the supply curve for labor, and to know how to calculate involuntary unemployment for a given minimum wage.  (See pp 165-168 of the text.)
 

Questions 12 and 13

90% of the class got question 12 right and 75% got 13 right.  See page 169 of the text for a diagram that shows the qualitative result in question 13.  Of course to answer the numerical question, you need to plug the ceiling price into the demand equation and the supply equation and subtract quantity supplied from quantity demanded.
 

Questions 14 and 15

About half the class go Question 14 right and about one-third got Question 15 right.
To answer 14 correctly you simply had to read and understand pages 169-170 of the text. To answer question 15, you had to know the definition of the price elasticity of supply and to realize that the new quantity after the price ceiling went into effect  will be on the same supply curve as the  original quantity. (See the picture on page 169.)  Price elasticities were discussed in detail in class. (About 2/3 of the people whose scores on the test were in the upper quartile got 15 right, while  almost nobody in the bottom quartile got this right. ) Yes it is important to go to class and pay attention to the lecture.
 

Question 16.

95% got this right. See the definition in the book.
 

Question 17.

90% got this right. See page 169 of the text.
 

Question 18.

35% got this right.  It is important to think clearly about this. Not every statement that sounds plausible is true.  Indeed if you really believed that this statement was true and if you were a firm in Experiment 5, you left some serious money on the table.
   Maximizing profit is not the same thing as maximizing profits per worker.   For example, in Experiment 5,  Session 3 the equilibrium wage was about $15. Your revenue would be $30 if you hired 1 worker, $55 with 2 workers, $75 with 3 workers and $95 with 4 workers.  At a wage of $20, you would make a profit of $10 if you hired 1 worker, and $15 if you hired two workers.  Your profit per worker be $10 with 1 worker and $7.50 if you hired only 1.  Which gives you the higher total profit? Which gives you the higher profit per worker?
 

Question 19

About 55% got this one right.  This is again a definition straight out of the text. See page 166.
 

Question 20

About 60% got this right.  If you paid attention to what happened in Session 3 of the minimum wage experiment and if you did your lab report for this session,  you should have been able to get this one.