|

|
Bree
Jones Lang
Ph.D. Candidate in Economics
2127 North Hall
University of California, Santa
Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9210
Office: North Hall 2017
Email: jones@econ.ucsb.edu
|
Research
|
|
The
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit: Increasing Affordable Housing Supply or
Developer Profit?, 2009 (Under Review), [Job-Market Paper, .pdf]
|
|
|
Abstract: The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
is the largest project-based housing subsidy in the United States. While
the program has expanded subsidized housing to suburban areas, some suggest
it continues to perpetuate race and income segregation like the public
housing it replaced. Previous studies attribute this outcome to qualified
census tracts, a location incentive within the program that motivates
construction in high-poverty areas. This study finds that in addition to
qualified tracts, rent incentives motivate the construction of tax-credit
housing in neighborhoods that are already affordable to low-income
families. This suggests that LIHTC subsidies may build housing in locations
that generate profit for developers without providing additional affordable
housing opportunities for low-income tenants.
|
|
|
The Effect of Access to Advanced Placement
Courses on SAT Scores and College Attendance, 2009
[.pdf]
|
|
|
Abstract: Many studies examine how taking
advanced courses affects student outcomes, but it is often difficult to
separate the effect of advanced coursework from student ability and school
quality. This study utilizes a grant in California that required a group of
high schools to increase the number of Advanced Placement (AP) courses
offered to their students. The grant provides an exogenous change in the
number of AP courses offered in a school, which proxies for participation
in advanced courses. Using a difference-in-differences estimation strategy,
I show that additional AP participation increases a high school's average
SAT score and the fraction of college-bound graduates that attend more
selective universities. Results not only confirm that advanced courses
affect student outcomes, but also suggest that unequal access to an
advanced curriculum is a long-term disadvantage to students from high
schools with fewer resources.
|
|
|
California School
Districts and the Decision to Propose a Parcel Tax, [Work in Progress]
|
|
|
Abstract: Since
the property tax and school finance reforms of the 1970s, California
expenditures per student have fallen 15 percent below the national average.
A tax on land that is constant for all parcels, called a parcel tax, is one
of the few ways California districts can increase school spending with
local tax revenue but is seldom utilized. Previous studies point out that
increasing school spending by one dollar for all students can cost voters
significantly more using a parcel tax in place of a property tax. This
study links the cost associated with parcel taxes to the probability that
districts hold a parcel tax election. Results show that the higher cost to
voters significantly lowers demand for additional school spending, which
makes parcel taxes an unviable option for many school districts. Building
on these results, an analysis of current spending levels and voter outcomes
indicates that districts do not exhibit budget maximizing behavior through
parcel tax proposals. In fact, it appears that most proposals are not large
enough to make up for disparities in property tax revenue.
|
|
|